Physiotherapists as first-contact practitioners for patients with low back pain in French primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial | BMC Health Services Research

Physiotherapists as first-contact practitioners for patients with low back pain in French primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial | BMC Health Services Research

  • World Health Organization. Musculoskeletal Health 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions.

  • Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10267):2006–17.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf AD, Erwin J, March L. The need to address the burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(2):183–224.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Haute Autorité de Santé. Prise en charge Du patient présentant une lombalgie commune. Saint-Denis La Plaine: HAS; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haute Autorité de Santé. Prise en charge Du patient présentant une lombalgie commune. Récommandation De bonne pratique. Saint-Denis La Plaine; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapinte A, Legendre B. Renoncement aux soins: la faible densité médicale est un facteur aggravant pour les personnes pauvres. Études et résultats, DREES. 2021;1200.

  • Anguis M, Bergeat M, Pisarik J, Vergier N, Chaput H. Quelle démographie récente et à venir pour les professions médicales et pharmaceutique? Constat et projections démographiques. 2021.

  • Chevillard G, Lucas-Gabrielli V, Mousques J. «Déserts médicaux» en France: état des lieux et perspectives de recherches. LEspace Geographique. 2018;47(4):362–80.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • World Physiotherapy. Policy Statement: Description of physical therapy 2019. Available from: https://world.physio/policy/ps-descriptionPT.

  • Babatunde OO, Bishop A, Cottrell E, Jordan JL, Corp N, Humphries K, et al. A systematic review and evidence synthesis of non-medical triage, self-referral and direct access services for patients with musculoskeletal pain. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0235364.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Demont A, Bourmaud A, Kechichian A, Desmeules F. The impact of direct access physiotherapy compared to primary care physician led usual care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2019:1–12.

  • Maselli F, Piano L, Cecchetto S, Storari L, Rossettini G, Mourad F. Direct access to physical therapy: should italy move forward? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(1):555.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojha HA, Wyrsta NJ, Davenport TE, Egan WE, Gellhorn AC. Timing of Physical Therapy Initiation for Nonsurgical Management of Musculoskeletal Disorders and effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(2):56–70.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs JD, Fritz JM, Wu SS, Flynn TW, Wainner RS, Robertson EK, et al. Implications of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:150.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz JM, Magel JS, McFadden M, Asche C, Thackeray A, Meier W, et al. Early physical therapy vs Usual Care in patients with recent-onset low back Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;314(14):1459–67.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornhöft L, Thorn J, Svensson M, Nordeman L, Eggertsen R, Larsson MEH. More cost-effective management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders in primary care after direct triaging to physiotherapists for initial assessment compared to initial general practitioner assessment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):186.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin RW, Hendrick PA. Physiotherapy as a first point of contact in general practice: a solution to a growing problem? Prim Health care Res Dev. 2016;17(5):489–502.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Halls S, Thomas R, Stott H, Cupples ME, Kersten P, Cramp F, et al. Provision of first contact physiotherapy in primary care across the UK: a survey of the service. Physiotherapy. 2020;108:2–9.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Caine R, Wynne C. Advanced practitioner physiotherapists in primary care: a new era. Physiotherapy. 2016;102:e142.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Donato EB, DuVall RE, Godges JJ, Zimmerman GJ, Greathouse DG. Practice analysis: defining the clinical practice of primary contact physical therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Therapy. 2004;34(6):284–304.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. First Contact Physiotherapy posts in General Practice: a guide for implementation in England. Chartred society of physiotherapy; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Physiotherapy. Énoncé de politique: pratique de la physiothérapie avancée 2019. 2019.

  • Vedanayagam M, Buzak M, Reid D, Saywell N. Advanced practice physiotherapists are effective in the management of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Physiotherapy. 2021;113:116–30.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Matifat E, Méquignon M, Cunningham C, Blake C, Fennelly O, Desmeules F. Benefits of Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy in Emergency departments: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2019;99(9):1150–66.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmeules F, Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Champagne F, Hinse O, Woodhouse LJ. Advanced practice physiotherapy in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:107.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafrance S, Vincent R, Demont A, Charron M, Desmeules F. Advanced practice physiotherapists can diagnose and triage patients with musculoskeletal disorders while providing effective care: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2023;69(4):220–31.

  • Lafrance S, Lapalme J-G, Méquignon M, Santaguida C, Fernandes J, Desmeules F. Advanced practice physiotherapy for adults with spinal pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2020:1–14.

  • Thompson J, Yoward S, Dawson P. The role of physiotherapy extended scope practitioners in musculoskeletal care with focus on decision making and clinical outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research. Musculoskelet Care. 2017;15(2):91–103.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley C, Shacklady C. The clinical effectiveness of the extended-scope physiotherapist role in Musculoskeletal Triage: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Care. 2015;13(4):204–21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Noblet T, Marriott J, Hensman-Crook A, O’Shea S, Friel S, Rushton A. Independent prescribing by advanced physiotherapists for patients with low back pain in primary care: a feasibility trial with an embedded qualitative component. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3):e0229792.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaens F, Barten D-J, Veenhof C. Identifying goals, roles and tasks of extended scope physiotherapy in Dutch primary care-an exploratory, qualitative multi-step study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabry LM, Notestine JP, Moore JH, Bleakley CM, Taylor JB. Safety events and privilege utilization rates in Advanced Practice Physical Therapy compared to traditional primary care: an observational study. Mil Med. 2020;185(1–2):e290–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie F, McRitchie C, Monteith W, Turner H. Physiotherapist as an alternative to a GP for musculoskeletal conditions: a 2-year service evaluation of UK primary care data. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(682):e314–20.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministère des Solidarités. et de la Santé. Pacte de refondation des urgences. 2019.

  • Hassenteufel P, Naiditch M, Schweyer F-X. Les réformes de l’organisation des soins primaires: perspectives multi-situées. Avant-propos. Revue française des affaires Sociales. 2020(1):11–31.

  • Haute. Autorité de Santé. Délégation, transfert, nouveaux métiers… Conditions des nouvelles formes de coopération entre professionnels de santé. 2007.

  • Haute Autorité de Santé. Protocole de coopération entre professionnels de santé (art. 51 de la loi HPST): bilan 2010–2018. 2018.

  • Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé. Les protocoles nationaux de coopération. In: Santé MdSedl, editor. 2022.

  • Fournier C, Bourgeois I, Naiditch M. Action De santé libérale en équipe (Asalée): un espace de transformation des pratiques en soins primaires. Questions d’économie de la santé. 2018;232(8):1–8.

  • World Health Organization. Task shifting: rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams: global recommendations and guidelines. 2007.

  • Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé. Arrêté du 6 mars 2020 relatif à l’autorisation du protocole de coopération « Prise en charge de la douleur lombaire aiguë inférieure à 4 semaines par le masseur-kinésithérapeute dans le cadre d’une structure pluri-professionnelle » 2020 [https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000041697989.

  • Kechichian A, Desmeules F, Girard P, Pinsault N. Acceptability of a task sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists in French multidisciplinary primary healthcare centres: a cross-sectional survey. Family Med Community Health. 2022;10(2):e001644.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345:e5661.

  • Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG, CONSORT Group ft. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012;308(24):2594–604.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Chan AW. SPIRIT (standard protocol items: recommendations for interventional trials). Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: a user’s manual. 2014:56–67.

  • Andreoletti F, Maselli F, Storari L, Vongher A, Erbesato M, Testa M, et al. Screening for referral of serious pathology by physical examination tests in patients with back or chest pain: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(24):16418.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucane LM, Downie A, Mercer C, Greenhalgh SM, Boissonnault WG, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, et al. International Framework for red flags for potential serious spinal pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020;50(7):350–72.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen AP, Downie A, Popal N, Maher C, Koes BW. Red flags presented in current low back pain guidelines: a review. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(9):2788–802.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25(24):3115–24.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens ML, Lin C, Maher CG. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. J Physiotherapy. 2015;62(2):116.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerkak D, Métivier J-C, Fouquet B, Beaudreuil J. Validation of a French version of Roland–Morris questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients. Annals Phys Rehabilitation Med. 2013;56(9–10):613–20.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London England). 2011;378(9802):1560–71.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleeland C, Ryan K. Pain assessment: global use of the brief Pain Inventory. Singapore: Annals, Academy of Medicine; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapane KL, Quilliam BJ, Benson C, Chow W, Kim M. One, two, or three? Constructs of the brief pain inventory among patients with non-cancer pain in the outpatient setting. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;47(2):325–33.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Poundja J, Fikretoglu D, Guay S, Brunet A. Validation of the French version of the brief pain inventory in Canadian veterans suffering from traumatic stress. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;33(6):720–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J pain. 2008;9(2):105–21.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Tu W, Wu J, Kroenke K. Comparative responsiveness of pain outcome measures among primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain. Med Care. 2010;48(11):1007.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, Fritz JM, Robinson ME, Asal NR, Nisenzon AN, et al. The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings. Phys Ther. 2013;93(3):321–33.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Traeger A, McAuley JH. STarT back screening tool. J Physiother. 2013;59(2):131.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz JM, Beneciuk JM, George SZ. Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):722–32.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruyère O, Demoulin M, Beaudart C, Hill JC, Maquet D, Genevay S, et al. Validity and reliability of the French version of the STarT back screening tool for patients with low back pain. Spine. 2014;39(2):E123–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie P, Turner C, Dowda M, Michener L, Nelson R. The MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care: a psychometric analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Therapy. 2005;35(1):24–32.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J, et al. Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: inception cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a171.

  • Chiarotto A, Maxwell LJ, Terwee CB, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Ostelo RW. Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: which has better measurement properties for measuring physical functioning in nonspecific low back pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2016;96(10):1620–37.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb SE, Hansen Z, Lall R, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, et al. Group cognitive behavioural treatment for low-back pain in primary care: a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9718):916–23.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraha I, Montedori A. Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ. 2010;340:c2697.

  • Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Van der Heijden G, Knipschild P, Köke A, Lindeman E, et al. Efficacy of traction for non-specific low back pain: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 1995;346(8990):1596–600.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Beurskens A, De Vet H, Köke A. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain. 1996;65(1):71–6.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, Singer DE, Chapin A, Keller RB. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine. 1995;20(17):1899–908.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung AS, Copay AG, Olmscheid N, Campbell D, Walker JB, Chutkan N. Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the spine literature. Spine. 2017;42(14):1096–105.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Demoulin C, Ostelo R, Knottnerus JA, Smeets RJ. What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire? Eur J Pain. 2010;14(2):200–6.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Finch E, Gill C, Moreland J. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther. 1996;76(4):359–65.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7(1):1–16.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine. 2008;33(1):90–4.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JC, Whitehurst DGT, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560–71.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornhoft L, Larsson ME, Nordeman L, Eggertsen R, Thorn J. Health effects of direct triaging to physiotherapists in primary care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2019;11:1759720X19827504.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson G, PortstrÖm M, Frick J. Extended roles in primary care when physiotherapist-initiated referral to X-ray can save time and reduce costs. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021;33(3):mzab122.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman PD, Loudon K, Dluzak L, Moloney R, Messner D, Stoney CM. Framing the conversation: use of PRECIS-2 ratings to advance understanding of pragmatic trial design domains. Trials. 2017;18(1):1–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, et al. A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(5):464–75.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Christley RM. Power and error: increased risk of false positive results in underpowered studies. Open Epidemiol J. 2010;3(1):16–9.

  • Halpern SD, Karlawish JH, Berlin JA. The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. JAMA. 2002;288(3):358–62.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochen H, Max H, Tamara B, Wilfried L. Multiple imputation of missing data: a simulation study on a binary response. Open Journal of Statistics. 2013;2013.

  • Kaptchuk TJ. Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence. BMJ. 2003;326(7404):1453–5.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Draak T, De Greef B, Faber C, Merkies I, Group PS. The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(6):850–5.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom DA, Kaplan DJ, Mojica E, Strauss EJ, Gonzalez-Lomas G, Campbell KA, et al. The minimal clinically important difference: a review of clinical significance. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(2):520–4.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright A, Hannon J, Hegedus EJ, Kavchak AE. Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). J Man Manipulative Therapy. 2012;20(3):160–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellekooren S, Donker M, Reijnders E, Boutalab L, Ostelo R, van Tulder M, et al. The introduction of advanced practice physiotherapy within Dutch primary care is a quest for possibilities, added value, and mutual trust: a qualitative study amongst advanced practice physiotherapists and general practitioners. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):529.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *